Nebraskans raised in an era of Republican dominance have grown accustomed to sleepy statewide races decided in GOP primaries. But the television airwaves this fall hint at something different: a U.S.

An electoral quirk could mean rural voters in Nebraska hold the tie-breaking vote in November’s presidential election.

The battle for the White House could come down to a single Electoral College vote from a single congressional district in Nebraska. It's unlikely, but plausible.

Nebraskans have a lot to think about in deciding how to vote this fall. But casting your vote, that's pretty simple. Here's how you can do it!

In today’s edition … New York mayor faces federal indictment ... Presidential nominees’ contrasting spousal visibility.

A rush of new ads attacking Republican Sen. Deb Fischer and her independent challenger Dan Osborn have blanketed Nebraska's airwaves as the closer-than-expected race draws national attention.

Results of New York Times/Siena College poll of 680 registered voters of Nebraska’s Second Congressional District conducted from Sept. 24 to 26, 2024.

Nebraska state Sen. Mike McDonnell (R) explained in an interview Tuesday that he voted against the GOP’s effort to change Nebraska’s Electoral College system because of the timing and

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) said Tuesday that he would not be calling a special session for lawmakers to consider changing the state’s electoral system to winner-take-all after one key GOP

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen said Tuesday that he has “no plans to call a special session” to change the way the state allocates electoral votes to a winner-take-all system, ending an effort led by Donald Trump.

An effort to prevent Donald Trump from losing a potentially crucial electoral vote from Nebraska appears dead. Republican Gov.